Medieval Medicine – comparing Muslim and Catholic knowledge and treatment of disease and infection

The Moslem faith pull in helped the treatments of disease and infection for many age now whatsoever of their herbal remedies argon plane apply today the modal value they capture helped e reallyone through the yearsThey have an interest in tutelage that comes from the volume which states that it is redeeming(prenominal) to help someone In need. The Catholic church has this except the Catholic church is more of a hotel than a hospital because that 10% of their hospitals genuinely care for the sick in addition in their culture to be a true(p) gymnastic horse you had to be able to canvas and write and some knights created librarys. At this time in England to be a good knight you had to be able to joust and be good at fighting.But 1 of the most big topics the Muslims did that the Catholics didnt do is collect Greek texts from writers like Hippocrates and Galen. The resolve this is so good is because non completely the anatomy stuff was right that the Greeks wrote but a circulate of their herbal remedies and recovers were right. At the comparable time we were carving crosses in batchs heads the Muslims were bent people with actual cures.Question 2 show up of 2Both the righteousnesss Catholic and Muslim have been a great twist to the treatments of disease and infection because even though in the Catholic hospitals it was monks and nuns curing the patients they did have some good herbal cures that had been passed down from generation to generation. The Catholic did have its bad side because it was monks and nurses curing the sick most of their cures were supernatural and only 10% of Catholics hospitals were actually build to cure the sick 47% housed the woeful and elderly(they provided no medical checkup care)31% of Catholic hospitals were leper hospitals (which provided no medical care) and the other 12% of hospitals gave shelter to poor travellers and pilgrims.The hospitals back then were non the same as hospitals today. There were a lot of good things about Muslim hospitals that were not in Catholic hospitals for example their hospitals gave a high proportion of hospital care also the hospitals were more purposefully built for example some of the bigger Muslim hospitals in cities like Cairo and capital of Iraq had hospitals with a big ward, libraries, rooms for resting, and a proper kitchen so they could give their patients a proper diet.The most important thing the Muslims did that the Catholics didnt do was they had proper doctors at the hospital and in the bigger hospitals they even had lectures so they could conduct medics.Also both the religions did have some similarities like both of their religions disallowed dissection and because of that surgery was not considered a useful skill to have. Also both of the religions judgment that theories were more important than practical procedures but one very bad thing both the religions did do by was allow no criticism of Galen. some(prenominal) doctors through out the years of Galens sway over medical knowledge tried and true to demonstrate new theories and some of their theories were actually right, but those doctors were shut down and thought of as lunatics because no one was allowed to headway Galen and his methods.In conclusion I cogitate that the religion that had the most impact on the treatments of infection and disease was the Muslim religion because they used more actual cures and remedies inappropriate the Christian church that mostly used supernatural remedies.